Beyond II Ultra vs Zoom: Which Whitening Machine Delivers Better Results?

Professional teeth whitening remains one of the most in-demand cosmetic treatments in Canada, and clinics are constantly comparing the most trusted in-office whitening systems. Two names often dominate the conversation: Zoom WhiteSpeed and the Beyond II Ultra Whitening Accelerator.

Both systems are recognized globally, but their technology, performance, and operating costs differ in key ways. Understanding these differences helps dental clinics and hygienists choose equipment that supports efficiency, patient comfort, and long-term profitability while remaining compliant with Health Canada standards.

This guide compares the Beyond II Ultra and Zoom WhiteSpeed systems side-by-side to help you make an informed, unbiased decision for your clinic and the whitening options you offer.

Why Compare Beyond II Ultra and Zoom WhiteSpeed?

While Philips Zoom WhiteSpeed has long been a household name in whitening, newer systems such as the Beyond II Ultra have introduced advancements that focus on comfort, speed, and flexibility.

Many clinics in Canada are now evaluating alternatives due to equipment limitations, long chair times, and higher per-patient costs associated with older heat-based lights and limited light output settings.

Many clinics researching newer systems also look into how whitening technology is evolving across the industry. Fern has covered these shifts extensively, including how clinics navigated the Zoom backorder period in Canada and what many teams chose as a Zoom WhiteSpeed alternative when evaluating different whitening options. These real-world insights have helped clinics make informed decisions long before upgrading their whitening systems.

Core Technology – Heat vs Light Intensity

Before comparing the two whitening systems, it helps to look at their underlying teeth whitening technology, including their light output, activation method, and overall impact on the whitening process.

The Beyond II Ultra uses a LUX-based, not heat-based, approach, meaning it activates whitening gels through light energy brightness rather than heat energy. This difference is key for patients prone to post-treatment sensitivity and during the overall whitening process.

Clinics using the Beyond II Ultra report faster oxidation of whitening agents, improved penetration of the whitening gel, and shorter chair times while maintaining patient comfort.

Workflow & Flexibility of the Beyond II Ultra vs Zoom WhiteSpeed

One of the biggest differences between these systems is how adaptable they are within a busy practice and how they support client preparation and system operation.

• Zoom WhiteSpeed is a locked-light system. It can only be paired with Zoom gels, and each gel light guide is programmed for four 15-minute sessions. Clinics that wish to use alternative gels must unlock the unit using third-party tools such as the Bleach Infiniter Chip.
• Beyond II Ultra Whitening Accelerator, on the other hand, is a universal light, meaning it can safely activate any professional-grade whitening gel, provided the formulation is Health Canada-compliant and free from filler-heavy ingredients that slow oxidation.

Clinics looking to optimize flexibility and inventory often appreciate the ability to pair Beyond lights with Fern's own Signature Fern Gel™ Pro 25%, a whitening formula containing hydrogen peroxide & carbamide peroxide designed for consistent, long-lasting results.

Clinical Experience & Patient Comfort

Patient comfort is a key differentiator between these two systems:

• Zoom WhiteSpeed relies on heat output, which can increase the risk of sensitivity, gum irritation, or pulpal inflammation, particularly due to longer chair time.
• Beyond II Ultra Whitening Accelerator uses ultrasonic technology and LUX activation, creating faster oxidation with minimal temperature rise, reducing post-treatment sensitivity through ultrasonic whitening.

Both systems achieve measurable whitening, but clinics prioritizing gentle, high-efficiency treatments often prefer systems that minimize heat exposure while still offering advanced teeth whitening results.

Cost & Efficiency Comparison

From a business perspective, both treatment time and operating costs directly influence profitability. Here's how the two systems compare based on typical market pricing and clinical setup considerations:

While the Beyond II Ultra carries a slightly higher upfront equipment cost, its shorter treatment cycles and lower per-patient expenses can make it a more time-efficient choice for clinics focused on optimizing workflow with a professional-grade dental whitening system.

Technical & Practical Advantages of the Beyond II Ultra

The Beyond II Ultra includes additional features that enhance both the whitening process and the overall patient experience, from output settings for a tailored treatment to a built-in air purifier that supports a healthier treatment space.

• Dual-cord operation – treat up to two clients simultaneously in an open-bay layout (simultaneous whitening).
• Extended reach – best-in-class 2 m flexible arm for complete smile-line coverage.
• Clean-air environment – built-in air purifier and air ionizer that reduces airborne pollutants for a cleaner and healthier treatment space.
• Universal compatibility – works with various professional gels, including Signature Gel B and Maxx5.
• Three-year warranty – full coverage on all parts and components.
• Optional - secondary light available for expanded setups.

For clinics ready to upgrade from older LED or heat-based systems, the Beyond II Ultra offers both immediate workflow benefits and long-term reliability. Learn more about Fern's authorized dealer status with Beyond International Inc. and favors the Beyond II Ultra Whitening Accelerator Machine.

Choosing the Right Whitening System for Your Clinic

When choosing between Zoom WhiteSpeed and Beyond II Ultra, consider:

• Treatment goals: Do you prioritize fast, high-intensity whitening or a gentler approach with shorter contact time and tailored light output settings?
• Cost structure: Factor in both initial investment and per-patient costs.
• Flexibility: Would a universal light improve efficiency across your whitening services?
• Support & compliance: Work with an authorized Canadian supplier to ensure your system meets Health Canada regulations.

If you're exploring options, Fern's experts can guide you through the setup and pairing process, from gel selection to accessories like the Beyond II FlexiPro Retractor or Secondary LED Unit for power whitening system setups.

If you're comparing the two systems more in-depth, Fern also provides detailed guidance to support the decision-making process. For example, many clinics exploring the Beyond II Ultra start by reviewing Fern's comparison of the best whitening machine options in Canada, along with a practical breakdown of how to purchase the Beyond II Ultra Whitening Accelerator through an authorized Canadian supplier. Clinics still evaluating their overall whitening setup may also find the guide on whether a teeth whitening light is necessary helpful when assessing different treatment models.

Final Thoughts on Zoom vs Beyond II Ultra

Both Zoom WhiteSpeed and Beyond II Ultra are proven in-office whitening systems offering superior whitening results for clients. However, their technology, workflow compatibility, and long-term costs differ significantly, which means choosing the dental whitening system that's the best fit for your clinic.

For many Canadian clinics, Beyond II Ultra is the latest improvement and evolution of teeth whitening systems. The Beyond II Ultra Whitening Accelerator combines advanced light technology, universal compatibility, settings for a tailored treatment, and a lower cost-per-treatment model, all backed by Fern Whitening Supplies' expert local support and authorized dealer status for Beyond International Inc.

Disclaimer: Philips Zoom WhiteSpeed and Beyond II Ultra are registered trademarks of their respective owners. This comparison is for informational and educational purposes only and is not endorsed by either manufacturer. All technical data is based on publicly available information.